District council seeks views on budget proposals

WYRE Forest residents are invited to give their views on the district council’s budget proposals for the next financial year.

Wyre Forest District Council is planning to freeze council tax for a third year running as well as spending £500,000 less than last year.

Leader John Campion said: ”The Government is reducing the amount of money it gives to us to provide local services by 23.25 per cent over the next two years.

“However, demand continues to grow for many of our services, often as a direct result of the wider economy. This means there is less money available to provide these services in the future.

“It is recognised that the district is in need of an economic boost and therefore the proposals include £500,000 to further enhance the £1 million provided last year to support local growth.

“The council also needs to reduce spending to ensure that it remains financially sustainable. Within the budget, there are proposals for increasing efficiency and some reductions in service.”

The proposed net budget for 2013-14 is £12.3 million, a reduction of £470,000 or 3.7 per cent compared to the current financial year.

This is based on an estimated reduction in the grant that the council receives from government of £486,000.

Conservative councillor Nathan Desmond, cabinet member for resources and transformation, said: “Such a large reduction means we need to consider changes in the way we deliver services.

“In some cases we will need to carefully consider whether we can provide a particular service at all. We would like your help in making these important decisions.”

The detailed proposals and questionnaire are available a wyreforestdc.gov.uk. The consultation closes on Friday, February 8.

Comments(8)

Mary79 says...
2:52pm Mon 7 Jan 13

how about cutting your allowances instead of services? or not building white elephants on the outskirts of kidderminster?

richs says...
5:42pm Mon 7 Jan 13

turn the heating down in council offices staff can wear warmer clothes

stour67 says...
10:52pm Mon 7 Jan 13

But that would mean they would have to make sacrifices and that will never happen

DOEPUBLIC says...
11:38pm Mon 7 Jan 13

A disgrace that conditions of service for employees are to be redesigned at the same time that the leadership have improved the conditions for themselves.
In addition, the public have no option in the contribution they make while there services are to be cut, at the same time the leadership extend their allowances.
Not too hard to figure out whose interests are served in this latest slight of hands.

jon cooper says...
10:58am Tue 8 Jan 13

Much the same as their own description of their own public buildings; WFDC as a local authority is becoming "tired dated and scruffy". In these days of austerity, WFDC is a joke with their attitude in responsible housekeeping in a financial sense; and clear biased governance !

As Kidderminster is looking to quite rightly regain their own Town Council once again, perhaps this is now the time to cut out the outdated and expensive 'middle man' that is WFDC, and for Kidderminster, Stourport and Bewdley to be answerable to one unit authority: Or perhaps a more sensible option; a 'North' and 'South Worcestershire' divide that could cater for everyone's better needs ;-)

Stephen Brown says...
10:48am Thu 10 Jan 13

Unfortunately, a unitary authority would be even more remote, less accountable, and that is no guarantee of a better control over spending or change in attitudes.

If there is a call for town councils to be re-vitalised and have more (accountable) powers and authority that is a different matter and I support that.

Councils in any case should be answerable to us - the people - whatever their size. Sadly, that is not the case presently.

I fear for the futue of councils, full stop. What with austerity and outsourcing, sell-offs and commissioning, there will be little left for councils to run and even less opportunity to be accountable as it's all handed over to the private sector for them to make a profit at our expense.

In the future, if this carries on, it is more likely councillors will just meet once a year to agree contracts and decide how much the councillors will pay themselves for the privilege of awarding contracts on 'our' behalf.

Sir Albert Bore (Birmingham City Council) commenting on the changes in local government brought about by the cuts has already said: "This is the end of local government as we have known it".

A stark warning indeed.

sladen54 says...
11:55am Fri 11 Jan 13

Why do we need 42 councilors? Half that number could do the job.

Stephen Brown says...
2:23pm Fri 11 Jan 13

And under the cabinet system the Tories make sure that only the views of 5 really count.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree