Decision on Areley Kings Tesco Express delayed for site visit

FIGHT GOES ON: Areley Kings' Londis Pantry Stores assistant manager Richard Taylor and residents Mark and Debbie Bywater at the Squirrel pub site. Picture: Phil Loach. 101432L.

FIGHT GOES ON: Areley Kings' Londis Pantry Stores assistant manager Richard Taylor and residents Mark and Debbie Bywater at the Squirrel pub site. Picture: Phil Loach. 101432L.

First published in News
Last updated
Kidderminster Shuttle: Photograph of the Author by , Reporter

COUNCILLORS were unable to come to a decision on an application which could lead to a Tesco Express store opening in Areley Kings.

Nearly 100 residents packed out Wyre Forest District Council's headquarters last night, with 50 filling the council chamber and more having to be seated in two other rooms in the building to watch as members of the authority's planning committee heard arguments for and against the application.

After more than an hour, hearing conflicting views from residents and Tesco representatives on the possible effects opening a store at the Areley Common site would have on traffic, quality of life for neighbours and fears large delivery trucks would cause safety problems, councillors decided to defer ruling on the application so they could visit the site.

It means a decision is now likely to be made at next month's planning committee meeting on May 11.

Resident Andrew Booton told the meeting: "Our local experience and knowledge of traffic is based on real-life experience, not computer models. There are clear planning grounds for refusal."

He said Areley Common was a narrow road and lorries would not be able to turn into and out of the site safely, without mounting the pavement.

The road has a weight restriction of 7.5 tonnes, which Tesco's trucks would exceed but the rule does not apply for vehicles accessing sites.

Transport planning agent Nathan Hanks, however, said he would be "out of a job" if delivery trucks could not access the site and suggested Mr Booton was "incorrect and simply being obstructive". He said most of those who would drive to the store would be driving through Areley Kings anyway and a Tesco Express would not have a noticeable effect on the area.

Labour councillor Jamie Shaw also addressed councillors, saying he was concerned about the effect on the quality of life of people living next to the store. He added: "My concern is for the amenity of the residents who live immediately opposite. We have already heard that this is an area where there is only on-street parking for some residents."

He criticised the council planning officer's report which said under a "worst case scenario" the Express would result in an average of about 169 cars per day visiting the site. "It will result in an increase in vehicle movements from next to nothing to 320 cars per day," he argued.

Following the debate, Conservative councillor Marcus Hart said: "I do not know this site as well as others, I think councillors should have a look for themselves."

The idea was opposed by Labour councillor Barry McFarland who argued the committee had inspected the site five years ago when considering an application for the village's Londis store but Liberal councillor Fran Oborski said: "I think it is worth us going to see this as a committee, preferably at a peak time, so we can see for ourselves what the traffic issues are."

Following the meeting, No to Tesco in Areley Common campaigner Mark Bywater wrote on facebook: "So, we get to live another day."

Comments (5)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

1:46pm Wed 9 Apr 14

clashy says...

Is it fair to say that these Councillors did not think it worthwhile to grace the area with their presence before the planning meeting to get some context for the points put forward by both sides?

Given that this issue has been at or near the top of the local agenda for months surely the Councillors should have made themselves familiar with the site?

In true British management style - "What do we do? - HAVE ANOTHER MEETING!"
Is it fair to say that these Councillors did not think it worthwhile to grace the area with their presence before the planning meeting to get some context for the points put forward by both sides? Given that this issue has been at or near the top of the local agenda for months surely the Councillors should have made themselves familiar with the site? In true British management style - "What do we do? - HAVE ANOTHER MEETING!" clashy
  • Score: 16

1:07pm Thu 10 Apr 14

Fran says...

Formal site meeting allows Cllrs on the Planning Cttee to view the site, with the relevant officers including from County Highways to see if the proposals will work. The alternative would have been approval!
Formal site meeting allows Cllrs on the Planning Cttee to view the site, with the relevant officers including from County Highways to see if the proposals will work. The alternative would have been approval! Fran
  • Score: 0

9:36am Fri 11 Apr 14

Saintinexile says...

But what is meant by "peak time"? When all the residents are at home, and Areley common is lined with cars ?(early morning, or when everyone is back from work in the evening), or in the middle of the afternoon when there is less traffic and less parked cars?
But what is meant by "peak time"? When all the residents are at home, and Areley common is lined with cars ?(early morning, or when everyone is back from work in the evening), or in the middle of the afternoon when there is less traffic and less parked cars? Saintinexile
  • Score: 0

2:25pm Fri 11 Apr 14

clashy says...

Fran wrote:
Formal site meeting allows Cllrs on the Planning Cttee to view the site, with the relevant officers including from County Highways to see if the proposals will work. The alternative would have been approval!
Fran

That is my exact point, the Committee knew there was a contentious issue that was to be debated - without going to the site, how could the committee have given it proper consideration and possibly approved or rejected?

Therefore this first meeting becomes pointless and a waste of nearly a hundred people's time.
[quote][p][bold]Fran[/bold] wrote: Formal site meeting allows Cllrs on the Planning Cttee to view the site, with the relevant officers including from County Highways to see if the proposals will work. The alternative would have been approval![/p][/quote]Fran That is my exact point, the Committee knew there was a contentious issue that was to be debated - without going to the site, how could the committee have given it proper consideration and possibly approved or rejected? Therefore this first meeting becomes pointless and a waste of nearly a hundred people's time. clashy
  • Score: 2

12:40pm Mon 14 Apr 14

Shibdrift says...

"Therefore this first meeting becomes pointless and a waste of nearly a hundred people's time"
That's what councillors do best!
What a bunch of..................
................???
"Therefore this first meeting becomes pointless and a waste of nearly a hundred people's time" That's what councillors do best! What a bunch of.................. ................??? Shibdrift
  • Score: 0

Comments are closed on this article.

Send us your news, pictures and videos

Most read stories

Local Info

Enter your postcode, town or place name

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree