Allowances paid to Wyre Forest councillors frozen

ALLOWANCES paid to Wyre Forest district councillors will remain the same as last year but most will still be higher than recommended by an independent panel.

At a fiery meeting of full council last night, the majority of councillors voted to freeze basic allowances at £4,900 - £700 higher than the £4,200 recommended by the Independent Remuneration Panel (IRP).

A “pick and mix” amendment from the Labour group - which would have seen some IRP recommendations accepted and others such as increasing the mileage allowance ignored - was voted down.

During an evening of political wrangling, Labour councillor Howard Martin described those pushing for a freeze as having their “snouts in the trough” but Conservative John Campion replied: “If [Labour] truly believed that they would not take [their full allowances], they would refuse them but they do not.”

Mr Campion said he believed the IRP report was “flawed”, did not represent the work elected members did and councillors had already taken steps to minimise costs.

Independent Community and Health Concern (ICHC) councillor Liz Davies said: “We have spent more time talking about what we pay ourselves than what the people out there need.

“I worked out I get paid £3 an hour for the work I do as a councillor.”

Conservative Nathan Desmond said freezing the allowances was the right thing to do and added: “We are in serious danger of making councillors exclusive to pensioners and those who want to top up their pension pots.”

Mr Campion’s allowance, as council leader, will remain at £12,250 despite the IRP recommending it should be £350 higher.

Deputy leader, Conservative Marcus Hart’s allowances, will stay at £9,188 - £1,838 higher than the IRP recommended figure.

The vote means allowances for Wyre Forest councillors are higher on average than those of councillors at all other lower-tier authorities in Worcestershire at £7,411. The second highest is Worcester City at £5,669.

Comments(6)

Stephen Brown says...
1:43pm Thu 28 Feb 13

Disgraceful. Welcome to the parallel universe that is WFDC.

neilhar says...
7:22pm Thu 28 Feb 13

Stunned. Again? Imbeciles.

Plus, how come I missed the fact that a/ design and build contracts are out for a liesure centre that I haven't seen go to full consultation and b/ why, allegedly, are councillors and officers burying costs of only £1.5 million to bring the glades upto scratch?

emjaypee says...
8:39pm Thu 28 Feb 13

Seems as though the national tory party think we are all in it together yet the local tories are all in it for themselves. All of us are equal but some of us are more equal than others.

Jerome K says...
10:03pm Thu 28 Feb 13

Seems like austerity is only for those without much money. Aren't these councillors from well off backgrounds mainly?

jon cooper says...
7:01am Fri 1 Mar 13

From flaws in the IRP's recommendations to snouts in troughs, this could have been the same full council meeting that was conducted 2 years ago regarding councillors allowances. It goes to show how far forward WFDC have come in that time when the residents of the district have endured neverending and supposedly necessary cuts to combat the economic situation.

I think it's a safe bet that in 12 months time this story will rear its head yet again; and again WFDC's clear defiance will be buried for another day !

comberton hill questions says...
12:57pm Thu 7 Mar 13

It is good to see Campions figures are below the recommended only just but still good to see - why does Marcus need £1838 above what is recommended this is somewhat surprising and insulting to the public who he represents.
It is amazing our council on the budget it is on is the highest payer - lets look after ourselves screw the public - there is NO point in having recommended levels of funding if you simply choose to ignore them so you receive more money - Campions point that Labour dont need to take their allowances is not a genuine argument - the argument is about the level it is allowed to be taken in the first place - regarding Nathan Desmonds point - i would rather have pensioners on our council not a collective of hypocrits taking the £££ and not giving a stuff - why is our council costing more than any other lower tier authority in Worcestershire on average per councillor?? Maybe Marcus can take a cut to bring that average down to start with - must be better uses than in Marcus's pocket i would hope - maybe use to mend the heating at Finepoint maybe??

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree