Bus re-route now agreed

Kidderminster Shuttle: 197 bus at Holy Cross Clent 197 bus at Holy Cross Clent

PLANS have been confirmed to re-route the 192 Stourport to Kidderminster and Halesowen bus to cover part of the 197 route that is being axed in September.

The 197 is used by elderly residents in the villages of Hagley, Clent and Blakedown but Whittle Coach & Bus Ltd has now announced its plans after attempts were made to save the 197 by Churchill and Blakedown Parish Council.

Jim Long, parish councillor, said the parish council was delighted at the co-operation from the bus company.

“This is a good outcome to what has been a difficult issue,” he said.

“A lot of elderly residents use the 197 and they would have found it very difficult to get around without any service at all.

“We’re absolutely delighted and would like to thank Whittles for engaging with the parish council to solve the problem.”

David Shipp, general manager of Whittle Coach & Bus Ltd, said: “We have offered to do this in the interest of members of the community.

“However, if usage in Blakedown and Churchill is not reasonable this change is likely to have a negative impact on the service so would urge the public to make use of this service.”

Worcestershire county councillors voted at a cabinet meeting this month to scrap the 197, following a review of subsidised bus routes, in a bid to save £3 million.

A spokesman for Worcestershire County Council said the majority of timetables for saved routes, including the re-routed 192 bus, would be finalised around next Monday.

Conservative county councillor John Smith, cabinet member with responsibility for highways, said: "The 197 is being withdrawn and partly replaced by the 192 and Whittles have agreed, due in part to the interest that has been shown by both the Blakedown and Churchill communities, to divert one journey per day to serve Blakedown and Churchill.

“With this in mind, the Lickhill Road and Windermere Road route in Stourport has been pulled.

“However, the 192 on all other journeys will continue to provide a regular service to Lickhill and Windermere.

“Passengers looking to use local community transport will need to pre-book and a fare will be applicable.”

Mr Long said Churchill and Blakedown Parish Council deplored the emphasis the county council was putting on community transport.

“The county council are depriving rural communities of their transport,” he explained.

“Community transport is unfair, as they do not accept free bus passes There’s a slight reduction in the price but it’s not enough. These cuts are thoughtless.

Comments (4)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

3:43pm Thu 3 Jul 14

JayEmEl says...

This is a really ambiguous piece. I quote two paragraphs.

“With this in mind, the Lickhill Road and Windermere Road route in Stourport has been pulled.

“However, the 192 on all other journeys will continue to provide a regular service to Lickhill and Windermere.

What will happen, will Lickhill Road and Windermere Way keep or lose their service?
This is a really ambiguous piece. I quote two paragraphs. “With this in mind, the Lickhill Road and Windermere Road route in Stourport has been pulled. “However, the 192 on all other journeys will continue to provide a regular service to Lickhill and Windermere. What will happen, will Lickhill Road and Windermere Way keep or lose their service? JayEmEl
  • Score: 0

7:41pm Thu 3 Jul 14

Stephen Brown says...

Does it mean that on the 1 journey a day that it goes to Blakedown etc the 192 won't service Lickhill & Windermere; but at all other times when it doesn't go to Blakedown It will service Lickhill etc? Yup, it's ambiguous and poorly worded. And just which journey a day is it? It's one thing saying use it or lose it but it depends on what journey and time it is. If it's inconvenient it won't work. And I hardly think one journey a day is enough. What direction? Get there can't get back, humpf. More information please...... In any case the blame is the council's not Whittles.
Does it mean that on the 1 journey a day that it goes to Blakedown etc the 192 won't service Lickhill & Windermere; but at all other times when it doesn't go to Blakedown It will service Lickhill etc? Yup, it's ambiguous and poorly worded. And just which journey a day is it? It's one thing saying use it or lose it but it depends on what journey and time it is. If it's inconvenient it won't work. And I hardly think one journey a day is enough. What direction? Get there can't get back, humpf. More information please...... In any case the blame is the council's not Whittles. Stephen Brown
  • Score: 5

11:49am Sat 5 Jul 14

Kiddy Echo says...

Am I the only person who realises Blakedown and Hagley have a regular train service into Kidderminster and these residents would be better off using this as opposed to an irregular bus service?
Am I the only person who realises Blakedown and Hagley have a regular train service into Kidderminster and these residents would be better off using this as opposed to an irregular bus service? Kiddy Echo
  • Score: 0

10:49pm Sat 5 Jul 14

blakedownron says...

Both stations are a considerable distance from the town/village centres and the shops though, meaning the train is not a real substitute for the bus, especially in the case of elderly people or those with disabilities.

Government cuts have forced the County Council to make savings, but surely they could have done this in a way (like cutting the salaries of high-earners) that doesn't impact on the poorest and most vulnerable in our community.

Also in the County Council's document "Proposed Revised Network of Services Receiving Subsidy", it states that the 192 service is only of "medium importance" and is "to be provided on at least 3 days per week", raising concerns that there may be weekdays when it does not run.
Both stations are a considerable distance from the town/village centres and the shops though, meaning the train is not a real substitute for the bus, especially in the case of elderly people or those with disabilities. Government cuts have forced the County Council to make savings, but surely they could have done this in a way (like cutting the salaries of high-earners) that doesn't impact on the poorest and most vulnerable in our community. Also in the County Council's document "Proposed Revised Network of Services Receiving Subsidy", it states that the 192 service is only of "medium importance" and is "to be provided on at least 3 days per week", raising concerns that there may be weekdays when it does not run. blakedownron
  • Score: 2
Post a comment

Remember you are personally responsible for what you post on this site and must abide by our site terms. Do not post anything that is false, abusive or malicious. If you wish to complain, please use the ‘report this post’ link.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree