Report this comment
  • "So the net effect of this then is Mark Garnier has the power to do nothing because the Government won't do anything?

    It's the Community union which is effectively leading this fight and he's hanging on to their coat-tails.

    It is rather frustrating to note that Mark Garnier and this Govt thinks it is fine to offer the rich a tax break and use public money to line the pocket of their rich friends on their privatisation scams but it's not ok to use public money to save an established business or help it modernise and become competitive. What bull.

    This is also exposes one of the other barmy situations allowed in the EU - the export of jobs from one country to another country to save companies on their labour costs. Level playing field? I don't think so.

    The fact that Portugal has higher business tax rates seems to make makes no difference it seems to some business. So why is it then that Mark Garnier & his Tory chums thinks lower business tax might be better for us? Key point? I don't think so. Running a successful business is not just about tax rates these days, it's about a host of things like maximising profit and doing that in the framework of a global system that allows them to exploit markets and more importantly exploit workers and pitch them against one another.

    Once again he has used his 'view' on the Shuttle to trumpet Government policy that has limited impact upon the majority of ordinary people. "MP's Propaganda from Westminster" would be a more suitable title for his column.

    I bet Brinton's workers are well buoyed by his statement that he can't help them and that it's all about tax. Basically Mark, sign the union's petition and shut up, because you appear to be saying you have no more influence than the rest of us."
  • This field is mandatory
  • This field is mandatory

  • Please note we will not accept reports with HTML tags or URLs in them.


  • Enter the above word in the box below

Please be fair, courteous and respectful to the views of others so we can build a vibrant community in a safe online environment. You are personal liable for your comments and action will be taken against anyone who offends, ridicules or posts malicious and damaging views. If you wish to complain, please contact us.

View from Westminster - March 29

10:30am Thursday 29th March 2012 in MP's View - Mark Garnier

The Community union has been raising a petition calling for the government to ‘do more’ to help Brintons. I hope to meet with them soon, to be able to chat with them about how we can all help Brintons and the wider carpet industry.

I am sure they will want to share with me how they are working with the management to modernise working practices to help Brintons return to sustained profitability, but their main question – how can the government help? – is an incredibly important one.

What has prompted this specifically now is that the Portuguese government has offered Brintons a cash incentive to move their looms and manufacturing headquarters from Kidderminster to their operations in Portugal. This is a fairly common practice and we in the UK have done this in the past. Pools of money to support investment is currently available in the UK and the Regional Growth fund, the Enterprise Initiative Scheme and other such schemes are available to businesses to finance projects and expansion.

The unions are asking, I believe, if the government will look at finding money to effectively match the offer from Portugal to make Brintons stay, but of course, the answer to that will be no.

I don’t think anyone would expect the government to enter into a bidding war to keep businesses from taking up offers from other countries; the outcome could end up with a ludicrous amount of taxpayers’ money pushed to private business just to stay still. It is right for government money to fund expansion, leading to new jobs; it is wrong to pay ‘retainers’ with no tangible outcome.

However, this debate does raise another question: why does the Portuguese government need to pay a financial incentive to lure a British business onto their shores?

Last week, the Chancellor brought forward the cutting of corporation tax to 22 per cent by 2014. If Brintons were to move to Portugal, they would have to pay as much as 29 per cent tax on their profits. For every pound Brintons pay in tax in the UK, they would have to pay £1.32 in Portugal. And that is the key point behind the budget last week. It is vital that we as a country are as competitive as possible on the international business stage. As a result of last week’s announcement, we now have one of the lowest corporation tax rates in the G20 and Brintons (and others) are significantly less likely to be lured by cash incentives elsewhere.

But the unions do have a good point. The budget also introduced measures for supporting creative technology, and measure to help research and development. But what are they doing for traditional industries such as carpet making? My job is to keep pressing the government on this to see how we can help.

CONTACT YOUR MP 􀁧􀁧 Email: mark.garnier.mp@ parliament.uk.

􀁧􀁧 Telephone: 020 7219 7198 or 01562 746771.

􀁧􀁧 Write: 9a Lower Mill Street, Kidderminster, DY11 6UU, or House of Commons, Westminster, London SW1A 0AA.

Local Businesses

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree