Councillors respond to Wyre Forest boundary proposals

Kidderminster Shuttle: Councillors respond to Wyre Forest boundary proposals Councillors respond to Wyre Forest boundary proposals

COUNCILLORS have admitted they might not be able to stop Wyre Forest's boundaries being carved up "nonsensically" by an independent body.

There was anger from all sides of Wyre Forest District Council's chamber during its annual meeting on Wednesday last week at recommendations from the Independent Boundary Review Commission for England to slash the number of district wards from 17 to 11 - to accommodate a cut in councillors from 42 to 33 next year.

The review was sparked after the policy was given the go-ahead by councillors last year after being spearheaded by the ruling Conservatives, who have been accused of "inviting the commission in and not knowing how to stop it".

Councillors from all parties were angry the commission had put forward suggestions for controversial ward proposals such as bundling part of Stourport with Wribbenhall and Kidderminster Foreign in a Severn Valley ward and a Wyre Forest Rural "super ward" which would see Wolverley, Cookley, Blakedown and Chaddesley Corbett banded together.

As the body is independent, Wyre Forest councillors and residents can only make suggestions to the boundary commission but the final decision lies with them and the commission is must meet a ratio of one councillor per every 2,500 voters.

UK Independence Party (UKIP) councillor Michael Wrench said his group supported the reduction in councillor number but admitted the proposals were "way off the mark". "We should use the current Worcestershire County Council boundaries," he said. "The public needs to understand the changes."

An amendment by Labour to demand an answer from the commission as to why the recommendations were "so far off the mark" was turned down after the majority of councillors did not think it would help.

Independent councillor Helen Dyke said: "We can put forward what we think but whether they listen or not is up to them. It breaks up communities and roads, it is nonsensical."

Labour's Nigel Knowles said the problem went back to the Conservatives plans to save money by cutting the number of councillors rather than members allowances. "The Tories have let the commission in, now they don't know how to stop them," he added.

Conservative councillor John Campion, however, said: "We are going to have 33 councillors whether people like it or not." He added: "We cannot endorse the recommendations, we must note them and give our response to the report."

Comments (3)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

6:38pm Sun 22 Jun 14

emjaypee says...

Sounds to me as though the only ones complaining are the ones who are likely to be ejected from the gravy train.
Cut the allowances and the number of wards and let's be done with.
My only hope is that some of those that lose out are the ones that keep switching parties mid term. In WF you vote for one thing only to find it is something else later on.
Sounds to me as though the only ones complaining are the ones who are likely to be ejected from the gravy train. Cut the allowances and the number of wards and let's be done with. My only hope is that some of those that lose out are the ones that keep switching parties mid term. In WF you vote for one thing only to find it is something else later on. emjaypee
  • Score: 1

9:54pm Mon 23 Jun 14

Stephen Brown says...

It seems to me political self-interest was behind the Tories ill thought through desire to redraw the boundaries, and what we'll end up with is nonsensical wards that will reduce the accountability of an already unaccountable council. It may even help reduce involvement of the already disinterested electorate even more. Farce is the word that would about best describe it. Should we be surprised? Nope, standard WFDC fare.

To quote Cllr Campion "Whether people like it or not" just about sums up their collective attitude.
It seems to me political self-interest was behind the Tories ill thought through desire to redraw the boundaries, and what we'll end up with is nonsensical wards that will reduce the accountability of an already unaccountable council. It may even help reduce involvement of the already disinterested electorate even more. Farce is the word that would about best describe it. Should we be surprised? Nope, standard WFDC fare. To quote Cllr Campion "Whether people like it or not" just about sums up their collective attitude. Stephen Brown
  • Score: 9

10:06pm Thu 26 Jun 14

Mr.Fie says...

Distict wards cut to 11 .. Councillors cut to 33.. sounds very masonic to me
Distict wards cut to 11 .. Councillors cut to 33.. sounds very masonic to me Mr.Fie
  • Score: 0

Comments are closed on this article.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree